Wednesday, May 26, 2010

People Watching - Assignment 2

I went to a restaurant to observe people, one I have only been in one time before. Although I didn’t understand it at the time, just by walking in and taking out a notebook I had already violated rule number one; single Hispanic females eating alone are different. I came in and sat down alone and then moved to a different table when I couldn’t get a good view of all the people in the restaurant. Moving seats after sitting down is another violation of the rules; don't do strange things that look suspicious. Pulling out a notebook and writing in a place where people are supposed to be eating broke rule number three; the appearance of monitoring someone even when in a public place and even when not confirmed, is cause for suspicion. Finally, staring (for periods of more than a second or two) is an invasion of privacy and looks of suspect or irritation will be shot back at you.

With my violation of the rules out of the way, here is what I observed. I noticed that women constantly converse, even while eating. They face each other directly, make almost constant eye contact when speaking, their speech is very animated and they often use hand gestures, they tend to lean forward when talking to each other, and consistently affirm their attention in a conversation with nodding, hmm’ing and ah’ing. They maintain their focus on the conversation they are involved in and didn’t appear to look around and make note of their surroundings or the other people. Their conversation was very animated and their facial expressions varied between smiling and laughing to looks of concern and seriousness.

The younger men I observed conversed far less than the women were not inclined to maintain more than a few seconds of eye contact at any given point, were less animated, and actually just seemed to be more relaxed. It was as if the conversation could happen or not and they weren’t concerned with it. One strange thing I noticed was a group of four men, where only three of the men from the group sat together and the other man sat at a different table. I overheard the one of the three men tell the waitress that the single man was with them. This single man just sat by himself and read a newspaper. Even when the newspaper was finished being read, he just sat there looking around. Never once did he attempt to make any conversation with the men he was supposedly with.

When two older men entered the restaurant, they sat directly across from each other, made more eye contact, and employed sporadic hand gestures when speaking. Their conversation was less fast paced than the women and eye contact was broken frequently but none-the-less still persisted. Perhaps it was because of their age, number, or relationship, but they appeared to be more willing to engage in active communication with each other than the younger men.

I should mention that the restaurant seemed to contain mostly middle-age to elderly men and women, there was no diversity outside of gender, and I was seated in a family style restaurant, not a bar.

As I mentioned in the beginning, I believe I did break some of the rules. The affect of breaking the rules were the looks of suspicion shot my way. I have no doubt if any other radically different behavior was exhibited in the presence of these people, they would either ignore it but show disapproval, curiosity, or they would leave the restaurant. The place I was in was a pretty "keep to yourself" kind of place where I don't think someone would directly speak out or against any behavior they thought was strange or different. Avoidance would most likely be the harshest reaction to deal with anything outside of the normal.
Do you think the communication pattern styles like I listed above are the same between genders regardless of the generation, or are their differences? This question refers specifically to face-to-face communication styles, not Internet, text, etc.

6 comments:

  1. I think it depends on how well they know eachother. When you have a young group of men who know each other very well (say they grew up together, or are relatives) I think they would be able to engage more in their conversations, as opposed to men who know each other but not on a personal level. I also think it is worth noting that there are differences in the way men communicate with each other as opposed to women. I think regardless of the age, women tend to engage more in conversations than men do--make more eye contact, use more hand gestures, and appear to be listening constantly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think many of the behaviors you described are consistant regardless of the generation. Women, regardless of age, do tend to make more eye contact, show more emotion, and listen more intently. Men tend to be more laid back and have frequent pauses in their conversation. However, there are also differences between the generations, especially with regards to how men and women act towards each other. Women of my grandmother's generation tends to be less forward and give men more power. For example, my grandmother would never contradict or argue with my grandfather in public. My grandfather is very respectful towards my grandmother (for example, pulling out her chair for her and taking her coat).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think communication pattern styles are different between male and female. If you were male, your parents would grew and treated you as a male more or less. For example, your parents buy you blue or green color T-shirts. For chirstmas, they(or Santa Claus) give you a car toy. If you were female, parents would told you come back before 10o'clock, or speak more polite. I believe these different treatments effect how people behave, and how they communicate with others.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think men and women do have different ways that they communicate. I also seen this in my observation and found it interesting. women tend to use lots of hand gestures where as men tend to just get right to the point. I think that generation would matter old people would tend to have a quieter conversation and younger people would be much more active in the way they talk to one another.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow that's a loaded question. So many factors come into play when considering the communication styles of men and women. I do believe, however, that when like genders are together, they tend to mirror each other while engaged in conversation. If four women are sitting together there tends to be more talking and laughter heard in the very general sense. Women are very relational creatures and enjoy sharing with one another. Men on the other hand, tend to have more of a purpose to their meetings. While not as relational, they may be watching television "together", watching the scenery of women, "together" or conducting a meeting that has a purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Laura. There is a bunch of details that need to be detailed and then those details too. Meaning of Woman and Man inside the context, we would need to know some of the relationships, the experience of those peoples and the the perspectives that they share. I love the list of your broken rules, well played, well executed. (LoL!)

    ReplyDelete